Alexis Pogorelskin Department of History, University of Minnesota-Duluth
"Politics for Keeps: The Dynamics of the Soviet Succession Struggle in the 1920s."
Elisabeth Gerber, Gerald Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan
"Geography, Campaign Contributions, and Representation."
Keya Ganguly, Department of Cultural Studies, University of Minnesota
"Malady versus Remedy: Critique in/and the Global South"
Abstract:
In his landmark work of intellectual history, Critique and Crisis
(1959), Reinhart Koselleck argued that there is a fundamental contradiction
between intellectual positions and political action produced by the
distance separating critique from circumstances of crisis. This
contradiction in turn produces a split between forms of political authority
and a private sphere of critical opinion that attempts to revise or
transform the public. According to Koselleck, this split originally
emerged during the Enlightenment – when a group of uprooted onlookers
emerged to comment on political concerns from which they were themselves
distant. It has since informed the constitution of critique in bourgeois
societies in which intellectuals are, by their structural position as well
as nature, out of touch with the very realities they wish to address. The
relationship of critique and crisis has thus largely been negative, one
that Koselleck describes as a "malady." However accurate this
historicization of critique in bourgeois societies, it neglects the
specificity of intellectual production in the global South, where the
breach between political and theoretical activity is less extreme and where
critique is more immediately responsive to the crisis of existence rather
than to crises of ideas alone. Here, one often finds a greater
articulation of the two, in part deriving from a different reading of
theory, particularly the texts of historical materialism, and also from a
different understanding of intellectual and political practice. This paper
elaborates on the nature of "peripheral critique" by going beyond
Koselleck's conservative propositions about the "pathogenesis" of crisis
and showing how "antagonism" operates as a mode of both thought and action
when theoretical contradictions are understood as part of the social
totality.
Robert Hullot-Kentor, School of Visual Arts, New York
"Severe Clear: Sacrifice and Right Wishing" (PDF)
Abstract: Severe Clear: Sacrifice and Right Wishing
In the context of the tenth anniversary of 9/11, in the midst of a sudden
deepening of the economic crisis partly or entirely overshadowing the
occasion, we hear raised from every corner primordial demands for the
necessity of sacrifice and self-inflicted wounds as the only adequate
response to the gravity of the situation. The intensification of the
economic calamity itself has by any measure been intentional, while
nationwide the only audible voices seem to be those calling for austerity
and for every budget to be 'cut.' The moment thus urgently prompts the
question of whether the seminal insight that has lapsed-the insight from
which the whole of radical modernism developed-can be recovered: the
insight into the primitive in ourselves and in the world around
us.`Severe Clear,' the weather alert issued to pilots on September
11th, 2001,is an excursus on this question that examines in detail the sacral edifice
now being constructed in lower Manhattan.
The Minnesota Political Theory Colloquium deeply thanks University of Minnesota Regents Professor Dr. Richard Leppert for making Prof. Hullot-Kentor's visit possible.
Alex Demirovic, Department of Political Science – Technische
Universität Berlin
The Minnesota Political Theory Colloquium will meet this week on Tuesday
"Reform, Revolution, Transformation" (PDF)
In collaboration with The German, Scandinavian, and Dutch Department, The Institute for Advanced Studies, The Institute for Global Studies, The Center for Austrian Studies, The European Studies Consortium, and Carleton College
Cesare Casarino, Department of Cultural Studies, University of Minnesota
Paper TBD
Suzanne Mettler, Department of Government, Cornell University
Paper TBD
Silvia Lopez, Spanish Department - Carleton College
"Brazil: critique, crisis and politics in the age of indetermination"
Abstract:
This paper will take as its point of departure the relationship
between critique and crisis as originally theorized by Reinhart Koselleck,
in order to present a reflection on the understanding of politics in the
age of indetermination as advanced by a number of Brazilian thinkers, such
as Paulo Arantes, Chico de Oliveira and Andre Singer. These thinkers have
taken seriously the premise that the emergence of a public sphere always
involves a suspension of the Hobbesian state and that its dissolution
brings about the return to a state of conflict and of a war of all against
all. The relevant case of such a dissolution is the current state of
capitalism and its manifestations in Lula's Brazil. The paper will engage
the debates surrounding the redefinition of the political and of a specific
political realm in contemporary Brazil, and how this redefinition contrasts
with the blurred distinction between the political proper and other public
realms that Koselleck early on criticized in our modern understanding of
politics. The work of the aforementioned thinkers invites us to rethink
the relationship between crisis and critique, but this time in dialogue
with Marx, Rancière and Habermas, and from the horizon of interpretation of
the global south.
Linda Zerilli, Department of Political Science – University of Chicago
"Towards a Democratic Theory of Judgment"
John Zaller, Political Science Department, UCLA
"Party and Ideology."
Joan Tronto, Department of Political Science - University of Minnesota
"Privatizing Neo-Colonialism: Migrant Domestic Care Workers, Partial Citizenship, and Responsibility"
Eric Shepard, Department of Geography – University of Minnesota
Paper TBD
Antonio Vázquez-Arroyo, Department of Political Science – University of Minnesota
"Realism, Utopia, and Colonial Enlightenment"