Paul Goren
pgoren@umn.edu
Social Sciences 1439
612-626-7489
Paul Goren is an associate professor of political science and serves as the Director of Graduate Studies for the Political Psychology Ph.D. Minor. He is also a core member of the Center for the Study of Political Psychology. He joined Minnesota in the fall of 2006, after having taught previously at Arizona State University and Southern Illinois University-Carbondale. His research interests center on the role citizens play in the American political system, specifically, whether politically unsophisticated citizens are capable of grounding their political choices in broader beliefs and values; the extent to which policy attitudes shape voter choice in U.S. presidential elections; the impact partisan bias has on political perception, judgment and behavior; the extent to which racial prejudice and stereotypes shape political attitudes and behavior; and the stability of political attitudes, beliefs, and identities. He teaches courses on public opinion, voting behavior, political psychology, political parties, basic probability and statistics, and econometrics.
Currently, he is working on a book entitled On Voter Competence (under contract with Oxford University Press: Series in Political Psychology). To date, the study of policy voting has been dominated by two questions. First, to what extent do liberal-conservative orientations shape voter choice? Second, to what extent do issue preferences guide voter choice? According to the sophistication interaction model that dominates the study of electoral behavior and political psychology, the propensity to vote on the basis of liberal-conservative attitudes and issues preferences–the first two faces of policy voting–is conditional on political sophistication. This in turn implies that the sophisticated approximate the standards of citizen competence more closely than the unsophisticated. This view is correct as far as it goes, but it ignores the possibility that a third face of policy voting exists. The central argument in my book is that political sophistication matters far less for political choice than typically supposed. My key theoretical claims are that (1) economic welfare, moral traditionalism, and hawk-dove orientations serve as the central policy attitudes in the belief systems of all citizens and (2) these principles shape the presidential vote to a comparable degree for citizens across the sophistication spectrum. These principles represent domain specific beliefs about what government should do in the major policy areas that define the American political agenda, and thus, are broader than preferences on specific issues. Moreover, because they are easy to develop and maintain, they come to shape voter choice for the sophisticated and unsophisticated alike. My analysis of opinion data covering the 1984-2008 presidential elections and data from two national surveys I conducted in 2007 and 2008 supports these claims. Put simply, the American voter policy votes to a much greater extent than currently recognized.
In his spare time , Professor Goren can be found squatting and deadlifting; deconstructing Lost; grooving to the sweet sounds of the Acid Mothers Temple Underground; and, most importantly, having fun with his family.
Links
Click here for a copy of his vita
Click here for information regarding the Political Psychology Minor
Click here for information regarding the Center for the Study of Political Psychology
Areas of Specialization
- American Government and Politics
- Public Opinion
- Voting Behavior
- Political Psychology
- Political Culture
- Political Parties
- Applied Statistics
Educational Background
- Ph. D., Political Science, University of Pittsburgh, 1998
- M. A., Political Science, University of Pittsburgh , 1994
- B. S., Industrial Management with University Honors, Carnegie Mellon University , 1989
Recent Publications
- N.d. "Personal Value Systems and Public Opinion: A Preliminary Report on Some New Value Items."
- 2009. "Source Cues, Partisan Identities, and Political Value Expressions." With Christopher M. Federico and Miki Caul Kittilson. American Journal of Political Science 53: 805-20.
- 2008a. "The Two Faces of Government Spending." Political Research Quarterly 61: 147-57.
- 2008b. "Dimensionality Redux: A Rejoinder to Professor Jacoby." Political Research Quarterly 61: 162-64.
- 2007. "Character Weakness, Partisan Bias, and Presidential Evaluations: Modifications and Extensions." Political Behavior 29: 305-25.
- 2005. "Party Identification and Core Political Values." American Journal of Political Science 49: 882-97.
- 2004. "Political Sophistication and Policy Reasoning: A Reconsideration." American Journal of Political Science 48: 462-78.
- 2003. "Race, Sophistication, and White Opinion on Government Spending." Political Behavior 25: 201-20.
- 2002. "Character Weakness, Partisan Bias, and Presidential Evaluation." American Journal of Political Science 46: 627-641.
- 2001. "Core Principles and Policy Reasoning in Mass Publics: A Test of Two Theories." British Journal of Political Science 31: 159-77.
Replication Files
- "The Two Faces of Government Spending." Stata files.
- "The Two Faces of Government Spending." EQS files.
Courses Taught
- 3766: Political Psychology of Mass Behavior
- 4767: Public Opinion and Voting Behavior
- 8123: Introduction to Quantitative Political Analysis
- 8302: Public Opinion and Political Participation
- 8360: Campaigns, Elections, and Voters